Yorba Linda mysteries still are intriguing
I
love a good mystery, and I find any puzzle with a Yorba Linda angle
particularly intriguing.
In 2007,
I tried to solve the mystery of a phantom publication, after a
Superior Court judge granted a Long Beach businessman's petition
asking to have a “Yorba Linda Voice” news-paper “ascertained
and established” as “a newspaper of general circulation.”
The
petition stated the Voice is “published for the dissemination of
local news” in Yorba Linda with “a bona fide subscription list of
paying subscribers” and had been “printed and published regularly
every Wednesday” in Yorba Linda for more than a year before the
petition was filed.
I
couldn't find anyone who had ever seen a copy of the newspaper,
including city and school officials, longtime residents and reference
librarians. More than six years later, I still haven't found a copy,
although the paper is listed on the county court website, updated in
November.
A more
recent baffler was investigated by the city's contract legal team,
Rutan & Tucker, involving a vacant parcel of land along Imperial
Highway, on the northeast side of the intersection with Lemon Drive,
just south of the now-closed bowling alley parking lot.
The
tiny, triangular plot enjoys great visibility from passing cars and
is used by local businesses for advertising signs and is popular for
political signage during elections. It took its present shape after
a reconfiguration of Lemon Drive.
Ownership
of the dusty patch came into question when the owner of the bowling
alley land--the Harold and Elsie Q. Gelber Trust--asked to purchase
the plot to fulfill landscaping obligations for the Fresh Market now
under construction.
A report
by Assistant City Attorney Megan Garibaldi noted the city believed it
owned the small plot at the time a conditional use
permit was approved for the market.
But a
city-requested title report determined the plot was owned by the
Olinda Land Company, a firm that no longer exists. Rutan &
Tucker requested a chain of title “as far back as the title company
could provide, but ultimately could not ascertain who is the current
owner....”
The
city's legal team surmised the tiny bit of land was owned either by
the city due to a conveyance for the construction of Lemon Drive
or the Gelber Trust because an easement to create Lemon Drive
reverted to the trust when the portion wasn't needed for public use.
The City
Council ended the legal tangle by executing a quitclaim deed
to the trust, “conveying the city's
interest, if any, in the remnant parcel.”