Yorba Linda voter turnout drops to historic low
The big
story in Yorba Linda's City Council election isn't so much who won or
how much money was spent by candidates and committees as the record
low number of voters who participated, despite the deluge of mailers,
roadway signs and automated telephone calls.
Less than half of 40,270 registered voters bothered to return a
mail-in ballot or visit a polling place, well below the 65.3
percent in the 2010 midterm election and 77.3 percent
for the 2012 presidential ballot, for an historic low in a regularly
scheduled election.
Only a
couple of special elections, such as last month's failed recall with
a 31.5 percent turnout – 12,783 out of 40,532 registrants – have
drawn fewer voters in 47 years of cityhood.
And the
number who voted for council candidates was even less, based on
counts for the contests and the tally for Measure JJ, which
eliminates pension and health benefits for fut- ure councils, that
drew hundreds fewer “yes” and “no” votes than the official
turnout.
Also
consider that at least 8,000 voting-age adults aren't registered, so
the percentage of Yorba Lindans who cast council race ballots drops
dramatically. Sadly, of 22,616 vote-by- mail ballots requested by
residents, about half were returned.
Certainly,
the negative nature of the council campaigns played a large part in
the lamentable lack of participation, with more than six out of every
10 voting-age citizens opting not to vote.
Two
factions emerged – Peggy Huang and Tom Lindsey versus Jeff Decker
and Judy Murray – with opposing camps calling each other liars in
mailers, phone calls and social media.
Ridiculous
roadway signage repulsed many voters, especially “Lindsey-Huang=More
Traffic, More Crime” and “Huang Hates Horses,” and all
candidates, responsible for zoning laws if elected, violated
portions of the law's temporary sign regulations.
Mailers
from both factions misrepresented issues and opponents, making it
difficult to pick the most egregious example, but I'll cite one sad
case from Huang, since she won the most votes.
Sent to
women voters, the brochure was portrayed as a “non-partisan voter
guide.” Four of five candidates were listed by first and last name
with picture, except for Judy Murray, who was “J. Murray” with
“photo not available,” obscuring her gender.
Also,
the retiree was listed as “unemployed,” omitting her homeowner
association presidency and other service. Let's hope this hit-piece
was a one-time aberration from an otherwise positive candidate that
was created by a too-eager consultant skilled as a negative
wordsmith.
Historical
note: Re-elected school trustee Karin Freeman joins the ranks of
this city's most popular elected officials. She will complete 32
years in office when her new term ends, second only to the late Paul
Armstrong, with 41 years as school trustee and water district
director, and just ahead of Hank Wedaa's 30-year council service.
<< Home