Recall, referendum, initiative: not easy processes
Yorba
Lindans enjoy the political protections offered by recall, referendum
and initiative provisions added to the state constitution during the
Progressive movement of the early 1900s, but laws passed to implement
these processes make victorious ventures a challenge.
This
city has experienced a handful of successful referendums and
initiatives, but no City Council member has ever been recalled,
despite a number of attempts through the years.
Triumphal
referendums and initiatives have dealt with density and development,
issues that always have won attention from residents since the 1967
vote for cityhood, partly to put zoning decisions into the hands of
locally elected leaders instead of county bureaucrats.
Past
petition efforts led to voter rejection of an “apartment zone” in
1970, council back-tracking on a 40-acre auto mall in 1987 and
adoption of an ordinance requiring public votes on major zoning
changes and abandonment of a high-density Town Center plan, both in
2006.
But four
prior recall attempts floundered, with only one gaining traction.
Two efforts against John Gullixson, in 1993 and 1999, didn't reach
the signature stage, and a 2006 drive targeting Allen Castellano,
Ken Ryan, Keri Wilson and Jim Winder sputtered badly.
Opponents
of second-term incumbent John Anderson gathered 7,856 signatures,
short of the 8,668 necessary for a recall ballot in 2012. The
signatures weren't checked against voter registration lists because
petitioners didn't have the required number for a legal count.
Anti-Anderson
petitioners didn't include his allies Nancy Rikel and Mark Schwing in
the recall effort, since both were up for re-election later that
year. (Schwing won, but Rikel lost.)
Leaders
of the current drive against Tom Lindsey and Craig Young are framing
the recall largely on density and development decisions made by the
pair. But Lindsey's term ends in December, when recall results are
likely to be certified, if the recall reaches the Nov 4 ballot.
Gene
Hernandez, who recall proponents deride as part of council's
“high-density majority” is oddly not a recall target, despite his
term running into December 2016, the same as Young's.
The
entire recall effort – from an initial “notice to circulate a
recall petition” through counting signatures and ballot placement –
is governed by a strict set of procedures and time frames outlined in
the state election code, and any deviation from the rules can derail
the process.
Petitions
must follow a specified format, including type size and spacing, and
signatures and addresses must match those on voter registration
documents. Circulators must be age 18 or over and answer truthfully
when asked if they are paid for signatures.
City
Clerk Marcia Brown can either verify each signature or a random
sample. If a sampling yields more than 110 percent of the required
number, the petitions will be certified, but if the sample runs from
90 to 110 percent, all signatures will be examined.
<< Home